Home Asiatica IJTS JSAWS Search Links
IJTS Logo
ISSN 1084-7553
 
  IJTS Vol. 3, No. 1
August 1998

  Editorial Note
  Gopinath Kaviraj...
  Computer Space
  Book Review
  New Titles
   - Il Monoteismo...
   - Rta-Ritu...
   - Aforismi...
   - Brahmins of Nepal...
   - Mongolian Portrait...
  News
 
  Support The IJTS
 
  Search
   
 
  Register
  Create Your Profile
  Recover Password
 
  Log In
 
 
 
  Institutional Sub
  none
 
Review Paper: The Mythology of BrahmA 

The Mythology of BrahmA
by Gregory Bailey,
with a Foreword by A. L. Basham

Delhi: Oxford University Press
1983, Pp. xvi + 256, Rs. 100

The book, based on the A.'s doctoral dissertation of 1980, purposes to examine BrahmA's "distinctive position and the meaning of his roles within the broad ensemble of Indian mythology" (p. xiii), in view of a threefold aim: to expound B.'s mythology taking into account all his roles in the major myths where he appears; to bring out the underlying unity of such roles, centering upon the values of pravRtti; hence, thirdly, to stress the importance of ideologies and value systems as interpretative keys of Indian mythology (p.xv).

Following the above guidelines, the book is divided into four sections. The first section (p. 3-36) deals with B.'s position in Indian religious history; although not quite congruent with the scheme, it fittingly prefaces the subsequent exposition by attempting an assessment of the god's status in the Indian pantheon during the transition from Vedic religion to the spread of bhakti movements. After tracing B.'s beginnings to a development of brahman, and especially to a "process of apotheosization" of the brahmA priest, the A. subscribes to Hacker's position of a stage of Brahmaism in Indian religion, as testified by some passages from the MahAbhArata and some of the older PurANa-s (or PurANa-sections), and reflected by the importance attributed to B. in the pAli canon. Furthermore, he gathers evidence of worship offered to B. at PuSkara, GayA and elsewhere, coming to the tentative conclusion that B. must have been worshipped "over most parts of northern India from about 400 B.C. to about A.D. 400" as a bhakti god, although expressing his own awareness of the paucity of the evidence adduced and other difficulties (p. 36).

[This is a preview of the full page; if you are a member of the Asiatica Association and have access to the IJTS, please login using the box on the left menu; non members: please become a member to support the Asiatica Association, and get full access to our publications.]