Home Asiatica IJTS JSAWS Projects Links
JSAWS Logo
ISSN 1085-7478
 
Abstracts
Current Issue
Back Issues
JSAWS Home
About the Editors
Aims of the JSAWS
Editorial Policy
Distribution Policy
Copyright Policy
How to Submit
Members' Benefits
Members' Login
 
Journal of South Asia Women Studies
Vol. 1, No. 2 January 1996

 
Abstracts
Stridhana: To Have and To Have Not by Enrica Garzilli
Back to Table of Contents | Back to Abstracts
 
Abstract - Stridhana: To Have and To Have Not

The paper is a survey and an analysis of Hindu women's rights to property (stridhana) in India. The first part deals with the connection between the Indian dowry and property. In fact, for centuries, dowry has been the only property of Hindu women. The second part is a diachronic study of the law according to the traditional Hindu law-books, the dharmasastras.

The interdependence between dowry, considered for centuries as a substitute for inheritance, and inheritance itself has also been investigated. The most authoritative Indian books of law from the Manavadharmasastra (2nd-3rd A.D.) until the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, and some major commentaries and digests on them, have been considered. The third part of the study focuses on the legal fracture between the concepts of property and stridhana under the British rule. The British misinterpretation of the traditional law allowed women to have full property rights only with certain restrictions and only when still alive. The third and fourth part of the paper analyze the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act (1937) and the Hindu Succession Act (1956). In the last part there is an attempt to answer a few questions arising from the study.

 
 
Back to Table of Contents | Back to Abstracts